@v4mpirism6 years agoMy personal opinion: i like the art style of the 2018 version better, but i like the fluidity of the 2008 version. I also think it looks better without being 3d. 2156
@
@crazyXninjaXfishy6 years ago2008 version just looks so much more fun. 2149
@
@fallingstars56836 years agoAt least the 2008 one was on beat and the limbs didn' t look like boneless noodles. 2032
@
@sakurablossom29496 years agoLet' s be honest guys. 2008 caramell girls danced this way better. 663
@
@isaacandrews65156 years agoSome things can never replace the original. 1317
@
@shinoxsage6 years agoYou know, for a 10 year anniversary, you think they' d put a lot more time and money into their product than telling a 16 year old to replicate the. ...Expand1095
@
@raspen46486 years agoI' m mildly disappointed that the animation in the old version is bouncier and more fun to look at the new one kinda looks like they' re i wasn' t expecting pixar but i was definitely expecting something like 2018 mmd y' know still happy to be reminded of a simpler time when the rainbow filter was the only acceptable filter. ...Expand445
@
@CherrygroveCity6 years agoI cannot help but say 3d > 2d this time, it pains me, but its the truth. 440
@
@magdalenelooper75226 years agoFirst they were lolis and now they are all grown. 490
@
@GoodNostalgia6 years agoI want to look at this without being blinded by nostalgia. In the end, I still prefer the 2008 one. The girls have more energy to their dance moves and there's dynamic camera movement. You can see them at more angles than just front-facing. The new girls aren't even singing in sync with the music, much less each other! Purple-haired girl is even looking around like she doesn't know what's going on! And their side-stepping move looks noodley! As for character design, both 2008 and 2018 look unsettling if you stare long enough! .....Expand135
@
@ghostgirl70896 years agoThe 2018 one looks like it was badly done in live 2d, since it looks too noodlely and not like an actual person dancing, more of a cartoon. The original. ...Expand881
@
@strawberryblossom44316 years ago2008 one looks like they are actually having fun. 46
@
@grimsum49166 years agoI like the hip bounce more in the 2008 because the skirts and such bounce with the girls and there just seems like there is more energy to it, however. ...Expand167
@
@leokitsune40566 years agoNow lets see how 2028 turn out if there will be ine. 63
@
@kendra90026 years agoThe 2018 one has a really cute style, but the original seemed much more bouncy and energetic. 95
@
@ScorpionsFatality6 years ago2018 looks like it was thrown together in flash. It just looks slow and stiff. Love the 2008 one though since i remember it when it came out xd id="hidden8" />2018 one is cringy. That' s just me though. It looks like they' re ragdolls being stretched. ...Expand770
@
@ellytucker31346 years agoI love the fact to they got rid of the spine twister move at 505
@
@Anppan6 years agoI like the 2018 style, more anime looking and doesn' t look like a lifeless smiling doll dancing. But the 2008 one had better anatomy and more syncthey repaired the girl' s spine, but it had a price, the 3 needed to have their arm bones turned into rubber like in harry potter. ...Expand38
@
@rae2cool4you4 years agoThe fact that they took out the back breaking move makes me want to cry. That part was my favorite. 10
@
@moppyearltea33816 years ago2008 still looks better for me - they look so energetic! 2018 looks like it would rather be somewhere else. 47
@
@bloodmuzzle6 years agoIn the 2008 one you can see the girls quote " dance to the beat. " 16
@
@cloveetv4 years agoIn the 2008 version theyre doing a lot more movement than the 2018 version. Also in the 2008 version the skirt bounces and in the 2018 it just sways. Ibeforecaramella girls did the 2018 version. ...Expand12
@
@1tastiger16 years ago2008 looks like it was made on older technology, 2018 (while having a better art style) looks like it was made on a very cheap budget but to the point that you can almost see the skeletons used to move the bodies. 2008 is better; looks like they tried to have something fun to watch with that one. ...Expand22
@
@arandomviewer95676 years agoIs it bad for me to say that i like the 2008 version of this only because its 3d and more cute? 153
@
@frillcovenant6 years agoThe original had more weight to the animation instead of being floaty. It was also a bit more visually appealing with more bits of animation than the newer one which seems like a single gif. 31
@
@islasfuntimechannel44146 years agoI like the 2008 one better thats it. 13
@
@cheeseucakee2 years agoIf they mixed the art style of 2018 with the dance moves of 2008 itd be pretty good imo. 7
@
@urmomlol15572 years ago2008 feels like they wouldnt judge you while 2018 feels like they would. 2
@
@gamegirl87226 years agoThey traded the rest of their bones for a spine. 7
@
@cameoshadowness77576 years ago2008 had more movement and felt way less stiff. 3
@
@neaht61694 years agoSong: " dance to the beat! " 2018 remake: literally misses almost every beat. 2
@
@Lupiterz6 years agoOn a technical level, 2018 would be considered best but 2008 is done from some sort of passion, it' s bouncy and so much more fun. It makes. ...Expand5
@
@rimcorom92245 years ago2008: this is funny! 2018: wtf? I dont want this 23 year old girl 50$ animation! 4
@
@sugarystarburst5 years agoComparing the drawing/animation of them side by side5
@
@TfrmSc2 years agoCaramelldansen will always hold a special place in my heart because of the nostalgia. 1
@
@Mimyakko6 years agoYesss thank you so much for making this.
@
@xcept12812 years agoNow this makes me realize how good the 2008 animation actually was, the only problem was the art style lol. 3
@
@megamilo956 years ago2008 girls has more energy and the 2018 girls. I' m not saying that 2018 girls are bad. There good. But 2008 girls are just a bit better edit: it' s my opinion. To avoid c r i t i c i s m. 91
@
@spiked_cheerios5 years agoThey really made the audio worse/better. If youve heard the misheard lyrics, they updated the audio for the 2018 version to make it sound more like the actual lyrics. 1
@
@enderf04955 years agoI remember playing this nonstop on my 11th birthday. I was a fucking weeb. 2
@
@Metallica4206 years agoWas literally looking for this and youtube put it in auto play lol. 11
@
@siennahartle90696 years agoIn the old version they look like theyre having way more fun. 1
@
@TheRealFDR4 years ago2008 makes me feel like i' m going to get arrested 2018 makes me want to get arrested. 2
@
@beccaniccals9526 years agoOh my wow the trio of caramella girls has been growing up over the years since their debut back in 2008. 5
@
@chouzetfafnir78804 years agoEscuhe esta cancion cuando tenia 5 aos con mi amigo japones.
@
@halo12390last yearLove 2008 version. The entire stage dance to the beat with them. Feels more to the rhytym. Also more intense movement makes me feel good.
@
@unidentifiederrors6 years agoI like the style of the new one, just not how it was animated and all. It be cool if it was still 3d and maybe with the 2018 style on some newer 3d models, then idk use a program like mmd for the video+ dancing. 63
@
@Doraemon-sw1zn5 years agoIm not surprised to hear the word meme from a song from 2008. 3
@
@mellow_miku5 years agoIt' s been 10 years and they still wear those intresting outfits. 1
@
@f1r3hunt3rz56 years agoYou guys are blinded by nostalgia. They made the 2018 version to suit the preference of the young' uns of this era, just like the 2008 one was made. ...Expand423
@
@jeiku50416 years agoThe new version looks okay. when paused. 1
@
@pleasehelp24462 years agoWhen you went to highschool during this songs hayday and everyone was doing the dance at homecoming. I still remember the steps.
@
@yukimikoto18086 years agoThe thing that really bugs me, is that the dancing is asynchrone to the song in the 2018 version as it is too slow. 1
@
@SynisterFour6 years agoI guess the girls have grown up, maybe that' s why they look taller in 2018 version? 5
@
@tarynisok87906 years agoI think the 2008 one seems more fun, fluid and less stiff while the 2018 one seems very emotionless and stiff. 2
@
@JodTheCod6 years agoThe problem i think with the 2018 one is that the movements (especially the hips) are animated slow out then slow in, making it seem like it decelerates. ...Expand1
@
@ElectroBlastLuigi6 years agoThe remastered was recommended and so this video: #39; 2
@
@QueenJess2k054 years agoEven tho 2018 was remade to the animation we use now. But 2008 still brings the homies vibing.
@
@Mary-ij9os6 years agoI like all of 2018 except the animation. I prefer the one of 2008 because the characters look less cringy. 5
@
@momokomomose-virtualyoutub66776 years agoI actually can' t believe it' s been 10 years.
@
@StrickenWithFear6 years agoWhen they do their signature dance move during the chorus in the 2008 version, it becomes incredibly dizzying with the camera jerking up and down like that.
@
@Chris-tn9bf5 years agoBetter question is why does it still exist 11 years later. 1
@
@anastasiarose14306 years ago" theso like do y' all know what quality 780p looks like or? 3
@
@calledtrout23096 years agoI like the new art style but the older one flowed way better. 1
@
@TheCorazonPawprint5 years agoI like the 2008 version better because, the dancing catches up with the music & beat. The 2018 one. Dosen' t. 3
@
@TheFloraBonBon4 years agoNo offense to anyone who may like the 2018 one, but the movement looks so stiff and what are they doing? A sliding shuffle? 1
@
@peaches32686 years agoYou know those creepy games onyeah that' s what the new one reminds me of and needless to say. That' s really bad. 3
@
@Raakai6 years agoFor those who don' t wish to read all of this, my opinion is that these versions are about the same in regards to quality. there are pros and for 2018, the art style is more detailed, the faces have improved the most, in my eyes. In this version, they also have attempted lip syncing, which i think is a cool feature. In the 2008 version, they basically have the same expression the whole video. In 2018, they also have more aesthetically pleasing visuals than the older one. There are more animations, and is more fluid, though some could argue that messes the video up. I somewhat agree. The recent verson also has some of the video actually relating to the lyrics, such as when they talk about countries. There' s more variety in this version, thus making it a bit more entertaining to watch. I won' t mention lyrics, as they aren' t part of the art itself in my eyes. However, it can be convenient for those who want to understand what they' re saying. in conclusion, i' d say they' re equivalent in quality, though in different ways. ...Expand2
@
@sanaa35766 years agoThis was my introduction to anime 10 years ago.
@
@RaineGamer0686 years agoOld one is better with style and motion and design in my opinion, new one looks way too. Flashy. 5
@
@bleepblop4886 years agoWhen they do the step to the side thing in the 2018 ver it looks so weird and awkward edit: they look boneless. 3
@
@nyaticat63916 years agoHow do you get worse after 10 years! The hip movements from the 2018 version are so choppy it looks like they dislocate from the crappy flash character model. 1
@
@jerenasmr15926 years agoI love the 2008 version when it comes with the movements, but i love the art style more on 2018 version.
@
@LightningStar6 years agoI did the exact same thing on my channel lol. 5
@
@declanisducky6 years agoThat' s why you never try to replace classics.
@
@ShionAkasuki4 years agoI' m nearly 20 and i use to dance infront of the tv to this when i was 7.
@
@zeph0shade6 years agoWhat stopped them in 2018 from making the dance match the beat of the song. 1
Related videos for Caramelldansen 2008 VS 2018 Comparison (English Version):
and the limbs didn' t look like boneless noodles. 2032
the new one kinda looks like they' re i wasn' t expecting pixar but i was definitely expecting something like 2018 mmd y' know
still happy to be reminded of a simpler time when the rainbow filter was the only acceptable filter. ...Expand 445
id="hidden8" />2018 one is cringy. That' s just me though. It looks like they' re ragdolls being stretched. ...Expand 770
thats it. 13
2018 remake: literally misses almost every beat. 2
but 2008 is done from some sort of passion, it' s bouncy and so much more fun. It makes . ...Expand 5
2018: wtf? I dont want this 23 year old girl 50$ animation! 4
edit: it' s my opinion. To avoid c r i t i c i s m. 91
2018 makes me want to get arrested. 2
when paused. 1
there are pros and for 2018, the art style is more detailed, the faces have improved the most, in my eyes. In this version, they also have attempted lip syncing, which i think is a cool feature. In the 2008 version, they basically have the same expression the whole video. In 2018, they also have more aesthetically pleasing visuals than the older one. There are more animations, and is more fluid, though some could argue that messes the video up. I somewhat agree. The recent verson also has some of the video actually relating to the lyrics, such as when they talk about countries. There' s more variety in this version, thus making it a bit more entertaining to watch. I won' t mention lyrics, as they aren' t part of the art itself in my eyes. However, it can be convenient for those who want to understand what they' re saying.
in conclusion, i' d say they' re equivalent in quality, though in different ways. ...Expand 2
edit: they look boneless. 3